Hijacking of reverse domains

In the event you ever needed evidence that related rights and brands continue to get challenges comprehending their digital IP, simply take a glance at a number of of recent domain dispute conclusions. It’s one thing to get a brand to get rid of a domain dispute, it’s just another matter entirely to be found guilty of what’s called Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH), or utilizing the dispute procedure in bad faith to ‘hijack’ or efficiently ‘bargain’ a domain.

In the past two months alone, the set of brands found guilty of RNDH is very remarkable; Wonderful People Magazine guilty of RDNH over BeautifulPeople.com, Fiesta eCigerettes over fiesta.com, Orient Express Travel Group over etg.travel, Gibson Guitars over EpiphoneAmps.com and Trend retailer Mango over mango.co.uk and mango.uk. In each case it’s not a question of whether the brands in question have nearly all the time they do, rights. What’s frequently not easy for some to decide is that those rights might not be exceptional, as well as other parties; firms or people might have an equivalent if not greater rights to digital asset or a domain name.

Several months past, among our bigger UK customers employed NetNames to procure the domain which will end up being the focus of a fresh international marketing campaign. Having having fought off interest from several other parties and worked together with the registrant, we agreed a deal for the customer. Ahead of the deal could finish yet, a UDRP subsequently filed against the registrant. A domain this is the issue of a dispute is not instantly unlock and, under ordinary conditions would mean that any sale would fall through. Rather than walking from the offer, we worked using Crowell &

Moring, the registrant and the client, our specialist legal associate, to decide whether there was anything we could do. Once the claim had been investigated by us, it had been confirmed that the filing in the 3rd party seemed unfounded for these reasons:
- The complainant held no registered trademark.
- Goodwill within their unregistered symbol will be limited to the united kingdom and wouldn’t be applicable to the registrant who was US.
- they’d taken no actions in the 13 years since its company was created and they chose to run in the dotOrg version of the domain in question.
- the complainant nor its Unregistered Symbol had acquired a solid reputation since its origin that was alleged.
- they’d attempted to get the domain, but didn’t need to cover the worth the registrant was searching for; in the end the registrant having a UDRP had threatened if their offer was not accepted by them.

On the grounds of the aforementioned info, we chose to use Crowell & Moring to defend the registrant, possess the case overturned and procure our customer the domain name.

The result was not even weaker than we anticipated. Not only did we have the UDRP overturned and win the case, but guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking and the complainant was found to be acting in bad faith. The domain is currently in the act of being transferred to an exceptionally happy customer from a registrant that is equally as joyful.

Whilst it turned out to be a great success, presenting our power to get the necessary result for our clients, in addition, it provided yet another example of how some brands still fight to learn the best way to make use of their digital IP as well as the continuing importance of support around the best way to efficiently protect their brand online.

Comments are closed.